Large language models (LLMs) learn to reason, think, and correct their mistakes through a process that often involves Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), which is a type of trial-and-error approach.
The process typically works like this:
Human Feedback: Human annotators are given a set of prompts and several possible responses generated by the LLM. They rank these responses from best to worst based on criteria like helpfulness, accuracy, and safety.
Reward Model: This human feedback is used to train a separate model called a reward model. The reward model's job is to predict how a human would rank a given response. It learns to assign a "reward" score to a response—a high score for good answers and a low score for bad ones.
Trial and Error: The LLM is then fine-tuned using a reinforcement learning algorithm. In this phase, the LLM generates a new response, and the reward model instantly provides a score without needing human involvement. The LLM's goal is to adjust its internal parameters to generate responses that maximize its reward score. Through this iterative process of trial and error, the LLM learns to correct its mistakes and produce outputs that are more aligned with what humans want.
The term "reasoning" is used to describe the LLM's ability to solve problems that require logical steps. While they don't "think" in the same way humans do, techniques like RLHF and prompting strategies like "Chain-of-Thought" encourage the model to break down a complex problem into a series of logical steps. The model learns that generating a sequence of intermediate steps before the final answer often leads to a higher reward, as it's more likely to be correct and well-reasoned.